How To Find Bugs Using Git Bisect With This Easy Guide
A beginners guide to the world of git bisect.
A source control system is an essential tool if you're writing software, even for your own side projects. Although I've used many version control software over the past 20+ years of development, I've only been using
git for the past 3 or 4 years. However it's quickly become my version control of choice due to its ability to quickly create branches, and its distributed nature. It's easy to master the basics of
git but, as with most pieces of software, there's a lot of power available if you choose to go beyond them.
git command that you might not have seen or used before is
git bisect, which is something I've only recently started using too. It's a great tool for quickly tracking down bugs in your project so let's take a look at how we can use it.
A wild bug appearsPermalink to "A wild bug appears"
I'm currently working on some high-traffic Node.js projects for work and, as I normally do at the start of a new task, I ran
git pull to ensure I had the latest code from our master branch, and then ran
npm install to update any dependencies. I ran the tests to check everything was ok but an odd thing happened: our test suite hung when it finished although all of the tests still passed. WHAT? Time to investigate.
I had no idea why this bug had crept into the project, nor when it first appeared in the master branch. My initial thought was that it was the last pull request that had been merged, so I checked out the previous merge instead but again, the tests were still hanging. This felt like a perfect opportunity to try out
git bisect for the first time in order to quickly work out which commit had caused the error.
What does the "git bisect" command do?Permalink to "What does the "git bisect" command do?"
Bisect performs a binary search to quickly find out the revision that caused a bug in your project's history. You do this by telling it which was the "bad" commit, the one which contains the bug, and which was a "good" commit, one in which you think the bug wasn't there. You can then use
git bisect to pick a commit which is halfway between the two endpoints and you determine whether that one is bad or good. This can be repeated by choosing the revision between these two points until you determine the specific commit which caused the bug. It's then up to you to look at the code to see what has changed and is probably the cause.
The "git bisect" processPermalink to "The "git bisect" process"
The first thing we need to do is tell
git that we're about to start using bisect by using the
git bisect start command. Before you do this, you should make sure you've committed or stashed any local changes to avoid losing any work as it will checkout each revision as we attempt to find the version containing the bug.
git bisect start
The next step is to determine when the bug first occurred and when we think that the repository was ok, and tell
git bisect which commit versions these were. This allows it to determine the range of revisions to search through.
# Use this if the bug occurs in the current HEAD revision
git bisect bad HEAD
# But if the bug occurs in a specific revision then use its SHA hash
git bisect bad 62c5fa0
For the good revision, you can choose an arbitrary place in the past but the more commits that have happened between the two endpoints, the more potential revisions
git bisect will have to check. This will depend on the speed of development in your project but it's probably wise to not choose a revision in time that was not too far away.
# Choose your good revision
git bisect good da5e24d
Now that you've chosen your two endpoints,
git bisect will choose a revision that's in the middle of these two and tell you how many more revisions it will need to check from this point.
> git bisect good da5e24d
Bisecting: 54 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps)
[dac781864e62c49b279c122c42d447ed26ad16e2] Merge pull request #100 from features/my-feature
It's now a process of elimination to determine which specific commit caused the bug. You do this by running your test suite or using your project to see if the bug is still present in the current revision. At this point
git bisect wants to know if this commit is good or bad so you answer
git bisect good or
git bisect bad.
> git bisect bad
Bisecting: 27 revisions left to test after this (roughly 5 steps)
[4f455b6e42487657e0492305f025dd82021735d5] some commit message from this revision
In my case, the
gulp task was still hanging so I answered that the commit was bad. The revisions are then split into two again and you need to continue to answer whether the revisions are good or bad until you reach the last revision and find the guilty commit. At this point
git bisect will show you which commit caused the problem and you can check the code in this revision to determine what has changed.
02ce44a7491e9b0151169647115f9a073513e0ce is the first bad commit
Author: some-author <email@example.com>
Date: Mon Sep 12 13:59:20 2016 +0100
Added some code that might break! :D
Once you've determined the cause, you'll want to finish your current
git bisect session. For this you just use the
reset command and it will reset to your HEAD to where you were before you started.
git bisect reset
Make sure you reset otherwise you will find your local working directory in a strange state, having checked out out a previous revision of the project.
Pro-tip: Bisect automationPermalink to "Pro-tip: Bisect automation"
Manually finding the bugs in your code is helped by using
git bisect but you can make things even faster by automating the process. You simply have to pass a script to be executed by
git bisect run. Doing this will run the script against each bisected commit in order to determine which one causes the script to fail.
# Set up our start and endpoints to check against
git bisect start
git bisect bad 62c5fa0
git bisect good da5e24d
# Run our gulp task which executes our
# test suite for each bisected commit
git bisect run gulp test
You'll have to ensure the script that you're using fails with a non-zero return value for this to work. For the code that fails in my above discussion, our test suite hung so it wasn't as easy to use automation here.
Conclusion: Use "git bisect"Permalink to "Conclusion: Use "git bisect""
As you can see, using
git bisect is an easy way to quickly determine where defects have crept into a
git project. You should start using it as its an effective tool to understand. For more information have a read of this great git SCM article on debugging with git. Also, take some time to look at the git bisect documentation too.
I'm Marc Littlemore.
I’m a Software Engineering Manager who works with high performing development teams and loves to help to grow other software leaders and engineers.
Want to learn more about technical leadership and intentional remote working to grow your career?
👉🏻 You should sign up for my weekly newsletter here.
Want to read more?
Easily Create Gravatar Images With Eleventy
If you're moving your Wordpress site to Eleventy, you will want to convert your Gravatar images too. Find out how easy it is using an Eleventy shortcode.
Automating your releases with semantic-release and GitLab
Releasing a new version of your application can easily be automated. Let's look at how we can use semantic-release and GitLab to make this process quick and simple.
You've got this: become a confident developer
If you're early in your software development career, you might not realise how good you are yet. Here are a few ideas to boost your confidence.